Fleeing the Police Does Not Always Give Probable Cause to Arrest in NJ

The police must have probable cause to stop and search without a warrant. A man exited a residence which was under surveillance by Newark police detectives investigating a shooting. Detectives watched the man stand on the porch until another man, the co-defendant, approached. The defendant stepped off the porch to speak with the co-defendant and co-defendant showed him what appeared to be a gun. Defendant looked at the object but never held or possessed the object. When the detectives approached, the defendant ran back onto the residence with a detective in pursuit. The detective tackled defendant into the residence as he was entering the door and saw weapons in plain view. The detective observed a shotgun, 3 long rifles and a stock of ammunition. Defendant was charged with illegal possession of the weapons and made a motion to suppress the guns at trial. In a case relating to probable cause to stop and search without a warrant, the NJ appellate court reaffirmed the prior decision, in Illinois v. Wardlow, setting forth the premise that flight alone cannot be used to justify stopping those who flee the police. The Court must look at the overall circumstances to determine whether the police could have had reasonable suspicion that the defendant was involved in criminal activity. This blog is for informational purposes only and in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. If you are facing criminal charges as a result of a wrongful arrest or illegally obtained evidence and believe you may be entitled to suppression of the confession, you should consult an experienced criminal law attorney immediately in order to protect your rights. For more information on probable cause, reasonable suspicion or other criminal law or municipal court issues in New Jersey visit HeatherDarlingLawyer.com.

Police Cannot Arrest For The Purpose of Obtaining Evidence Without Probable Cause

A police officer in Hackettstown observed the defendant stagger across route 46 and enter a vehicle then proceeded to stop the vehicle and arrest the defendant for disorderly conduct and being under the influence. Upon placing the defendant under arrest he conducted a search of the defendant's person and discovered 2 bags of heroin on the defendant's person and defendant was ultimately charged with 3rd degree possession of a controlled dangerous substance, heroin, and being under the influence of a controlled dangerous substance (CDS) without a prescription. Defendant challenged the legality of the search and seizure and filed a motion to suppress the evidence but the motion was denied. The New Jersey Appellate Court reversed the trial court and held the officer did not have probable cause to arrest the defendant when he was simply a passenger in a vehicle. In finding there was no probable cause, the court order that the evidence obtained from the search incident to arrest was to be suppressed. If you believe your rights have been violated through an illegal search and seizure, you should consult an experienced criminal law attorney immediately. For more information on search and seizure, CDS, under the influence, disorderly conduct or other criminal law matters in New Jersey visit HeatherDarlingLawyer.com. This blog is for informational purposes only and in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter.

Warrantless Search Without Danger Exceeds Community Caretaking Role of Police in NJ

Following receipt of an anonymous call about domestic violence, the police appeared at a New Jersey residence to determine whether there was danger to anyone. Upon arrival, police were met at the entrance to the apartments by the alleged victim. The alleged victim advised the police there were no problems at the residence and she was not in danger. The police found the circumstances to be curious, especially the fact that the alleged victim was at the door waiting for them, rather than inside with the other occupants. In order to determine whether the alleged victim was truly safe, the police insisted upon gaining entry into the apartment and were admitted into defendant's apartment by the parties' 11 year old child. Upon entry into the apartment, the police saw no signs of danger or unrest and no weapons were observed in plain view. At that time, rather than accepting that there was no actual danger present, the police violated defendant's rights by undertaking a warrantless search of the premises. The illegal search revealed a handgun under a pillow near the defendant and he was charged with a weapons offense. Only in the case of an emergency requiring immediate action by the police is a warrantless search permissible. The New Jersey Supreme Court held that this was an illegal search in violation of defendant's rights to enjoy the protections of the constitution relating to a person's home as offering a reasonable expectation of privacy from intrusion. This blog is for informational purposes only and in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. If you face criminal charges and believe that evidence against you was illegally obtained by police, you should consult an experienced criminal law attorney immediately in order to protect your rights. For more information on search and seizure, illegal search, warrantless search, domestic violence, anonymous tips or other criminal law matters, including municipal court matters, in New Jersey visit HeatherDarlingLawyer.com.

Lack of Consent to Search Permits Withdrawal of Guilty Plea in NJ

Police received a tip from an informant about two black males selling drugs out of a car belonging to defendant. When police located the vehicle at the location provided, they notified defendant of their belief there were drugs in the trunk and requested permission to search. Upon denial of consent to search, officers proceeded to open the trunk and located the drugs the informant stated they would find. After entering a plea of guilty to two counts of third-degree possession of a controlled dangerous substance (CDS) with intent to distribute, the defendant moved to withdraw his guilty plea. In spite of the fact defendant may have been notified of his right to file a suppression motion, and that his right would be waived by entering a plea of guilty, defendant chose to plead guilty. Defendant later filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea. After the Court below denied the defendant the relief sought, the New Jersey Appellate Court found that the Motion to withdraw the plea should have been granted. Defendant's appeal was granted on his contention that he did not consent to the search of the trunk of his car. Defendant claimed that he expressly denied consent to open the trunk of the car but the police did not honor his rights. Because the search may have violated defendant's rights, granting defendant's motion to withdraw the guilty plea was appropriate. This blog is for informational purposes only and in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. If you face criminal charges as a result of an illegal search, you should consult an experienced criminal defense attorney immediately in order to protect your rights. For more information regarding illegal search and seizure, 4th Amendment rights, drug charges or other criminal law matters, including municipal court matters, in New Jersey visit HeatherDarlingLawyer.com.