Confession of a Juvenile Sex Offender Without Parents is Admissible in NJ

The Union County Prosecutor's Office contacted a juvenile's parents regarding an alleged sexual assault committed by the 13 year old boy, A.W. The child's father, whose first language is Spanish, voluntarily brought A.W. to the Union County Child Advocacy Center for an interview. The standard for confessions of a juvenile under 14 is that they are presumed inadmissible unless a parent or guardian was unwilling or unable to be present. This interview began in the presence of the father and discussion was in Spanish because the father speaks very little English. As the interview continued, A.W. offered his denials of any sexual conduct with the victim in Spanish but began to provide the detective conducting the investigation information in English. The detective then advised that even if the allegations were true, A.W. would likely receive therapy but not face juvenile detention or jail. The detective next began making reference to the domineering size of the boy's father and the fact that the father's presence may render A.W. fearful of consequences. In English, A.W. offered to speak candidly with the detective if his father was not there. The detective explained to the father, in Spanish, that A.W. wished to speak with her without his father's presence and presented the father with a waiver of his right to be present upon which she required his signature before he left the room. Once alone with the detective, A.W. admitted to touching the victim's vagina. The confession resulted in a charge of aggravated sexual assault as a juvenile, a conviction, 3 years of probation and Megan's Law, N.J.S.A. 2C:7-1 to 11 and 19. A.W.'s motion to suppress the videotape of the interview was upheld by the N.J. Supreme Court on the grounds that the father willingly and voluntarily left the room. If a juvenile is charged with a crime, the disposition of the charges can change his or her future by prohibiting them from entering certain schools, fields of employment and, in the case of Megan's Law offenses, certain residences or neighborhoods. It is critical for any juvenile charged with a criminal offense to seek an experienced juvenile defense attorney immediately to begin protecting their rights and their future. For more information on juvenile offenses, sex-offenses, Megan's Law provisions or other criminal charges in NJ, visit HeatherDarlingLawyer.com. This blog is for informational purposes only and in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter.

Jurisdiction of Prosecutors in NJ Sex Crimes Extends to Acts As Far As Germany

During a Paramus Catholic High School trip to Germany, two chaperones, Michael Sumulikoski, and assistant coach and substitute teacher, and Artur Sopel, vice president of operations, were alleged to have had sex with minors entrusted to their care. Bergen County Superior Court Judge James Guida heard the case of State v. Sumulikoski. The Judge ruled that, although the conduct was alleged to have occurred in Germany, the defendant’s role as supervisors began in New Jersey. Each defendant was charged with multiple counts of sexual assault and endangering the welfare of a minor. Sopel was also charged with witness tampering. The Judge held that the question turned on whether a material element of the sexual assault statute, the relationship of the accused to the victim, could be considered conduct. His conclusion was that the defendants’ role as chaperones was the specific conduct the Legislature intended to prevent. The act of conduct, undertaking the role of chaperone, in New Jersey was the key to permitting prosecution in New Jersey. This blog is for informational purposes only and in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. If you are accused of a sex crime, you should consult an experienced criminal law attorney immediately in order to protect your rights. For more information on sex offenses or other criminal law matters in New Jersey visit HeatherDarlingLawyer.com.

Possible Elimination of Time Limits on Sexual Abuse Suits in NJ

A bill pending in NJ, A-2405, would eliminate the statute of limitations on sexual-abuse lawsuits. The current statutes call for the filing of a lawsuit within 2 years of the abuse or, if the victim is a minor, 2 years after the victim reaches the age of majority. If passed, this bill would open the possibility of bringing their abusers to justice for many for whom this possibility has long ago ended. This expansion of opportunity could serve as an additional deterrent to those who would choose to commit such crimes believing they would escape prosecution under the current statute. For those who have committed such offenses over 2 years ago and believed they had escaped prosecution, this may re-open the possibility of prosecution. Although the bill has not yet passed, it is likely this will cover past crimes as well as crimes not yet committed. This blog is for informational purposes only and in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. If you are charged with a crime, you should consult an experienced criminal law attorney immediately in order to protect your rights. For more information on Megan's law, sex-crimes, endangering the welfare of a minor or other criminal law matters in New Jersey visit HeatherDarlingLawyer.com.

A Glimpse Into Megan's Law Registrant Risk Assessment Scale in NJ

Megan's Law requires registration of sex offenders and bears certain notification criteria. In the Matter of Registrant P.B. was appealed following a decision by the Superior Court, Law Division in Bergen County. Every sex offender is subject to a risk assessment to determine their potential to reoffend. The Law Division Judge's ruling that his score be set at 54, in the mid-range of "risk to reoffend," and requiring notification to all local law enforcement, educational institutions and community organizations within a mile of his home. Additionally, his name was to appear on the sex offender registry. The score of 54 was based on the Judge's finding that P.B.'s possession of photographs of adults in acts of penetrating children amounted to penetration by P.B. Further, the judge held that possession of photographs satisfied the duration element of the assessment. On appeal, the Court held that the penetration element of the risk assessment is not satisfied by simply possessing photos of adults in penetrative activity with children. Further, the court held that, without evidence of time of possession, the duration of offensive behavior element could not be met and no points could be assessed. Without the 15 points assessed for penetration and the 3 points assessed for duration, P.B.'s score of 54 was reduced to 36 points, which placed him in the low range of scoring as it pertains to risk of reoffense. This blog is for informational purposes only and in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. Sex offenses bear penalties which will affect you for the rest of your life, even if you reach a plea agreement that may seem favorable at first glance. If you have been charged with a sex crime you should consult an experienced criminal defense attorney immediately in order to protect your rights. For more information on sex crimes or other criminal law matters, including municipal court matters, in New Jersey visit HeatherDarlingLawyer.com.

NJ Rape Shield Law Protects Content of Messages To And From A Child In A Criminal Trial

A defendant accused of aggravated sexual assault, sexual assault and endangering the welfare of a child may introduce, at trial, evidence of the child's participation in communications constituting "sexual conduct." Lack of opportunity to introduce the fact that communications existed could deprive a defendant of their right to defend against the State's charges and evidence needed for a fair trial must be admitted as long as the value of the proofs are not outweighed by their prejudicial effect. The fact that a child previously participated in the exchange of text messages and internet communications with adult males while the child also pretended to be an adult may be introduced as evidence by the defendant. However, the specific content of the messages is protected under the New Jersey Rape Shield Law (N.J.S.A. 2C:14-7) based on the notion that any probative value of the content of the messages is substantially outweighed by the prejudice the messages would cause. The goal of the court in making this determination is to serve the interests of justice while protecting the privacy of the victim. The NJ Rape Shield Law is not limited to the protection of children but was amended in 1988 to include children under its protection. The law is intended to limit the introduction of the victim's prior sexual behavior to both protect the victim's privacy as well as prevent prejudice in the minds of the jury regarding the victim and any potential to have been a willing participant in the defendant's conduct. This blog is for informational purposes only and in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. If you are accused of a sex crime, you should consult an experienced criminal law attorney immediately in order to protect your rights. For more information on sex offenses or other criminal law matters in New Jersey visit HeatherDarlingLawyer.com.

Substantial Increase in Penalties for Harboring a Sex Offender in NJ?

Pending legislation in New Jersey would increase the penalty for harboring or concealing a sex offender. The current offense grades for violating N.J.S. 2C:29-3 are 3rd degree if the sex offender is guilty of a 2nd degree offense and 4th degree if the sex offender is guilty of a 3rd degree offense. Any lesser offense on the part of the sex offender would subject the individual harboring or concealing the offender to a disorderly persons offense. If passed Assembly bill A-2079 subject an actor harboring or concealing a person subject to registration as a sex offender while the person has knowledge the sex offender has not registered to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment without eligibility for parole. In the event the offense is of the 3rd degree, the actor would be ineligible for parole for a minimum of 3 years. In the event the offense is of the 4th degree, the actor would be eligible for parole for a minimum of 1 year. This bill is sponsored by Assemblywomen Munoz, serving Morris, Somerset and Union, and Simon, serving Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex and Somerset, and Assemblyman Caputo, serving Essex County. This blog is for informational purposes only and in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. If you are accused of a sex offense or harboring a sex offender, you should consult an experienced criminal law attorney immediately in order to protect your rights. For more information on sex offenses or other criminal law matters in New Jersey visit HeatherDarlingLawyer.com.

No Expectation of Privacy In A Cell Phone Number in NJ

A former Morris County teacher, Patrick DeFranco, was indicted on charges of first-degree aggravated sexual assault, second-degree sexual assault and third-degree endangering the welfare of a child after a wiretap provided evidence of a past sexual relationship between the teacher and a former student. The abuse had gone unreported for 7 years and the student no longer had evidence of the relationship. In order to obtain evidence, the victim agreed to call the Defendant while the police listened on a recorded line. The cell phone number the victim had for DeFranco was no longer valid so the Morris County Prosecutor's Office, with the help of Denville police, obtained DeFranco's current cell phone number from Valleyview school. A call took place in which DeFranco chose to discuss past sexual contacts with the victim. At trial, DeFranco moved to suppress the wiretap based on the fact that, although he had given his prior cell phone number to the victim, he had not given the number used for the wiretap to the victim. He further argued that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell phone number and the police should not have obtained same without a warrant, for which they may not have met the probable cause requirements. Morris County Superior Court Judge Dangler refused to suppress the evidence obtained from the phone call. The NJ Appellate Court upheld Dangler's decision, finding there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in a cell phone number and, even if there was, DeFranco waived it by giving the victim his number in the past. The Appellate Court also noted DeFranco's choice to recall intimate details of his past during a voluntary conversation with a victim he had sexually abused in the past. This blog is for informational purposes only and in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. If you are charged with a crime, you should consult an experienced criminal law attorney immediately in order to protect your rights. For more information on megan's law, sex-crimes, endangering the welfare of a minor or other criminal law matters in New Jersey visit HeatherDarlingLawyer.com.